multi-textarea data model keyed on (url, timestamp)
- 主要言語
- HTML
- スター
- 58
- フォーク
- 0
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
説明
As the code stands, there is a `Spot` datatype. It represents the abstract concept of where a single textarea is. e.g.
- appending the 2nd comment on issue 4
- appending the 3rd comment on issue 4
- **pros**: we have enough data to recreate the draft completely in the browser, and also enough data to tell if it was submitted or not
- **cons**:
- a lot of manual work for each place that we handle
- ambiguity around things like the `issues/new` url. You might have multiple unsubmitted drafts in progress, they don't have server-side IDs yet, what should their spot be? Inevitably it gets tied to the time that the tab happened to open, in which case why bother with the complexity of defining the "abstract place where a comment is" if you end up just doing `timestamp, URL` pairs?
This approach really falls down for complex multi-form things, such as this:
It would be *really* painful to lose the drafts in those textboxes, but it's also impossible to make a spot for each textfield in every issue/PR template that might be out there.
Another approach is this:
- anytime a textarea gets added or removed, trigger a refractory state that waits until there's been no changes for 500ms
- when that refactory period times out (the textareas have settled), the Spot is defined as:
- primary key: (url, timestamp)
- schema: list of textareas and their labels, as best we can tell in a generic way
- title and icon: pulled from the tab by default
- **cons**: most of the time, this is not enough data to reopen the tab for the user
- **pros**:
- if the user has opened a tab manually, we can find which saved drafts fit that schema
- textareas can be enhanced by default, versus right now where they are enhanced only iff we have built an enhancer for that specific box
コントリビューションガイド
調査の方向性
Start by tracing the existing Spot datatype and the current textarea-enhancement flow described in the issue. Compare how drafts are identified and restored with the proposed URL/timestamp schema; done means the project has an agreed generic model for preserving and matching multi-textarea drafts.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 領域
- frontend
- issue の種類
- リファクタリング
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 35/100