[coverage] Conformance findings: STATEMENT-025
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 52/100
Research direction
Start by reading the failing test test_cancel_during_result_fetch_is_prompt_and_signal_only in the coverage PR and run it against both thrift and Rust-kernel SEA paths. Compare the driver behavior with the STATEMENT-025 contract and reference PR 362; done means fetch cancellation is prompt, reports a cancellation error with SQL state HY008, and later statements still work.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
Surfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-python. Each finding is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT (post-fix) behavior and stays red until THIS driver (databricks/databricks-sql-python) is fixed, then flips green as a tripwire.
Findings
- STATEMENT-025 [thrift]: Cancel during result FETCH unwinds the fetching thread with wrong-state RESOURCE_DOES_NOT_EXIST ('Command does not exist') instead of a cancellation error
- failing test:
test_cancel_during_result_fetch_is_prompt_and_signal_only(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)
- failing test:
- STATEMENT-025 [sea]: Cancel issued during a result FETCH is silently dropped on the Rust-kernel SEA path, so the in-flight fetch never unwinds and drains to natural completion
- failing test:
test_cancel_during_result_fetch_is_prompt_and_signal_only(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)
- failing test:
- STATEMENT-025: Cursor.cancel() issued during a result FETCH is not honoured on either backend: thrift's interrupted fetch unwinds with wrong-state RESOURCE_DOES_NOT_EXIST instead of a cancellation error, and the Rust-kernel SEA path drops the cancel entirely so the fetch drains to natural completion; after a sync execute() returns, no cancellable in-flight operation is registered for the fetch phase
Reproduce & Expected
STATEMENT-025 — Validates cancellation while a result set is being FETCHED (not merely while the statement is EXECUTING -- that is STATEMENT-015/022).
Reproduce:
SELECT * FROM main.tpcds_sf1_delta.catalog_returns
SELECT 1
SELECT * FROM main.tpcds_sf1_delta.catalog_returns
Expected (per the shared spec):
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- completes without an exception
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- completes without an exception
- full assertion contract:
result:
- label: idle_cancel
no_exception: true
- label: mid_fetch_cancel
no_exception: true
- label: mid_fetch_cancel
elapsed_seconds_range:
min: 0
max: 5
- label: cancelled_fetch
error:
contains:
- cancel
- cancelled
- canceled
- aborted
- label: cancelled_fetch
sql_state: HY008
- label: cancelled_fetch
elapsed_seconds_range:
min: 0
max: 30
- label: reused_statement
no_exception: true
- label: reused_statement
row_count: 1
- label: concurrent_cancel
no_exception: true
- label: concurrent_cancelled_fetch
elapsed_seconds_range:
min: 0
max: 30
Context
- The behavior was first fixed in a DIFFERENT driver — reference PR: https://github.com/databricks/databricks-odbc/pull/362 — which seeded the shared language-neutral spec. This issue tracks the same conformance gap in databricks/databricks-sql-python; the reference PR is for cross-referencing the intended behavior, NOT a change to this repo.
- Coverage PR carrying the reproducing xfail test(s): https://github.com/databricks/databricks-driver-test/pull/1562
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 233
- Forks
- 152
- Avg merge
- 21h 5m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from databricks/databricks-sql-python
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
All issues in databricks/databricks-sql-python
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
🐛 Bug 🔔 Pending processing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
jumpserver/jumpserver#17584 ·