[coverage] Conformance findings: PARAMQUERY-022
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 78/100
Research direction
Start at DecimalParameter._cast_expr and inspect the CAST_EXPR.format call described in the issue. Use the coverage PR's tests/ diff to locate test_decimal_target_carries_declared_precision_and_scale, then run that test; done means SELECT ? AS v preserves the declared DECIMAL(10,2) shape and the expected 123.45 Decimal128 result passes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Summary
Surfaced by the multi-language coverage fan-out while conformance-testing these SPEC-IDs against databricks/databricks-sql-python. Each finding is committed as an expected-failure (xfail) test in the coverage PR — the test asserts the CORRECT (post-fix) behavior and stays red until THIS driver (databricks/databricks-sql-python) is fixed, then flips green as a tripwire.
Findings
- PARAMQUERY-022 [thrift]: DecimalParameter._cast_expr formats the DECIMAL cast with its arguments transposed — CAST_EXPR.format(self.scale, self.precision) — so a declared precision=10/scale=2 target emits DECIMAL(2,10) (scale greater than precision, invalid) instead of DECIMAL(10,2), losing the declared decimal shape on the wire
- failing test:
test_decimal_target_carries_declared_precision_and_scale(see the coverage PR diff undertests/)
- failing test:
Reproduce & Expected
PARAMQUERY-022 — Verify a DECIMAL/NUMERIC target with a declared precision and scale sends the parameter as a DECIMAL carrying THAT precision/scale, so the bare-marker result column is a decimal of the declared shape and the fractional digits survive.
Reproduce:
SELECT ? AS v
Expected (per the shared spec):
- result has exactly 1 row(s)
- col 0, row 0 == '123.45' (type Decimal128)
- full assertion contract:
result:
- row_count: 1
- column:
index: 0
row: 0
type: Decimal128
equals: '123.45'
- result_column_type_matches_target: true
Context
- The behavior was first fixed in a DIFFERENT driver — reference PR: https://github.com/databricks/databricks-odbc/pull/167 — which seeded the shared language-neutral spec. This issue tracks the same conformance gap in databricks/databricks-sql-python; the reference PR is for cross-referencing the intended behavior, NOT a change to this repo.
- Coverage PR carrying the reproducing xfail test(s): https://github.com/databricks/databricks-driver-test/pull/1061
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 233
- Forks
- 152
- Avg merge
- 21h 5m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from databricks/databricks-sql-python
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
engineer-bot
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
databricks/databricks-sql-python#860 · 3 comments ·
All issues in databricks/databricks-sql-python
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
🐛 Bug 🔔 Pending processing
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
jumpserver/jumpserver#17584 ·