Factory for multiple verbs

> [](https://github.com/JeanSebTr) **Comment by [JeanSebTr](https://github.com/JeanSebTr)**
> _Wednesday Apr 27, 2016 at 18:43 GMT_
>
> _...snip..._
>
> I'll check to clean that up and make a pull request (I've also added factory support to multi verb https://github.com/Emergensys/commandline/commit/2ebe156199f8bad3c0155c8c415e3363949941ff), but I'm a bit lost in the functional style.

I've got a `CLIOptions` class that takes an `IClock` instance as a constructor parameter, so I'm using the `ParseArguments` overload that accepts a `Func` to initialize the instance that gets populated.

I'd like to be able to subclass `CLIOptions` in order to build out a set of verbs, so I was looking for a way to use a factory with multiple verbs (the subclasses would need to receive the same constructor arguments). I didn't see anything obvious in the `Parser` class, but I stumbled across the quoted comment in https://github.com/commandlineparser/commandline/issues/70.

However, at this time https://github.com/Emergensys/commandline/commit/2ebe156199f8bad3c0155c8c415e3363949941ff is no longer available (or not public). I also wasn't able to find anything that I thought might be the PR @JeanSebTr is referring to in this repository.

Is multi-verb parsing with a factory a supported scenario?

先閱讀 Parser 類別和接受 Func 的 ParseArguments 多載，接著將這條路徑與多個 verb 的 parsing 流程進行比較。查看 issue 70 以及所參照的 Emergensys 提交，以了解先前的設計背景。完成的標準是確定 factories 是否能夠使用共用的建構函式引數初始化多個 verb 子類別，並記錄或實作受支援的行為。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。