Factory for multiple verbs

> [](https://github.com/JeanSebTr) **Comment by [JeanSebTr](https://github.com/JeanSebTr)**
> _Wednesday Apr 27, 2016 at 18:43 GMT_
>
> _...snip..._
>
> I'll check to clean that up and make a pull request (I've also added factory support to multi verb https://github.com/Emergensys/commandline/commit/2ebe156199f8bad3c0155c8c415e3363949941ff), but I'm a bit lost in the functional style.

I've got a `CLIOptions` class that takes an `IClock` instance as a constructor parameter, so I'm using the `ParseArguments` overload that accepts a `Func` to initialize the instance that gets populated.

I'd like to be able to subclass `CLIOptions` in order to build out a set of verbs, so I was looking for a way to use a factory with multiple verbs (the subclasses would need to receive the same constructor arguments). I didn't see anything obvious in the `Parser` class, but I stumbled across the quoted comment in https://github.com/commandlineparser/commandline/issues/70.

However, at this time https://github.com/Emergensys/commandline/commit/2ebe156199f8bad3c0155c8c415e3363949941ff is no longer available (or not public). I also wasn't able to find anything that I thought might be the PR @JeanSebTr is referring to in this repository.

Is multi-verb parsing with a factory a supported scenario?

Commencez par lire la classe Parser et la surcharge de ParseArguments qui accepte un Func, puis comparez ce chemin avec le flux de parsing multi-verbes. Examinez l’issue 70 et le commit Emergensys référencé pour comprendre le contexte de conception antérieur. Le travail est terminé lorsqu’il est établi si les factories peuvent initialiser plusieurs sous-classes de verbes avec des arguments de constructeur partagés, et que le comportement pris en charge est documenté ou implémenté.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.