coder / coder/coder-desktop-macos
Securely pass a Coder session token to the (System) Network Extension
- 主要言語
- Swift
- スター
- 29
- フォーク
- 8
- 平均マージ
- 18時間 14分
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 4
説明
The Network Extension requires a session token for a Coder deployment in order to function. This is (and should be) stored in the macOS Keychain.
When registering the network extension as a system VPN, a `NETunnelProviderProtocol` can be configured and passed to the network extension when it's started (via `NEPacketTunnelProvider.startTunnel`). `NETunnelProviderProtocol.serverAddress` allows us to pass the access URL of the deployment.
`NETunnelProviderProtocol.passwordReference` is described as:
> a persistent reference to a keychain item with the kSecClassGenericPassword class.
This field doesn't take into account the fact that the Network Extension might be a System Extension (as opposed to an app extension, used when submitting the application to the macOS/iOS App Store).
For reference, the WireGuard macOS app uses an app extension, running as the user, not root. It's able to pass a keychain reference to that app extension after modifying the item's keychain ACL.
In our case, there's a few problems:
1. Whilst Keychain Access Groups exist to share keychain items between multiple sandboxed applications, they require all apps use the data protection keychain (as opposed to the file-based keychain).
Programs that run outside of the user context (such as our NE, running as root), cannot use the data protection keychain. [[1]](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/technotes/tn3137-on-mac-keychains) [[2]](https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/746205)
2. File-based keychains are accessible from both users and the network-extensions. However, the sandboxed application is only capable of writing to the user keychain, and the network extension is only capable of reading from the system keychain. The application would need elevated permissions to write to the system keychain, and use `passwordReference` to pass a keychain `persistentRef`. [[3]](https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/680013) [[4]](https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/133933?login=true&page=1#694688022)
The dev forum solution appears to be to send the credentials over some IPC, which would definitely be XPC in our case ([3], [4]). However, sending the session token over XPC in our case might lead to an annoying implementation: when the VPN is started it first must wait for yet another message containing the session token.
Instead, the current (hacked) solution involves just storing the session token within the `NETunnelProviderProtocol.providerConfiguration` dictionary. I believe the only difference between this and XPC is that this configuration is written to disk. We currently store Coder CLI tokens on disk too right now, though it'd be good to improve both situations in the future.
More:
https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/694431
コントリビューションガイド
調査の方向性
まず、issue に記載された NETunnelProviderProtocol.providerConfiguration の経路と NEPacketTunnelProvider.startTunnel のエントリポイントを追跡します。Keychain と XPC の代替案を確認し、その後、providerConfiguration に保存せずにセッショントークンを安全に引き渡すことを完了条件として定義します。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- macos, swift
- 領域
- desktop, operating-systems, security
- issue の種類
- リファクタリング
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 25/100