Proposal: Integrate PR Auto-Reviewer to add structure and triage visibility

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
I noticed that while the project has a solid validation pipeline, there isn't much automated structure for incoming Pull Requests. Without standardized commit titles or size labels, it can be easy for PRs to slip through the cracks or sit in Draft status for months.

**Describe the solution you'd like**
I built an open-source, n8n-based PR Auto-Reviewer that I believe would be a great lightweight addition to your workflow.
It automatically:

- Checks PR titles against Conventional Commits formatting to keep the history clean.

- Adds size labels (Small/Medium/Large) so you know what can be reviewed quickly.

- Pushes a structured summary to Discord, which helps maintainers keep an eye on queue activity without constantly checking GitHub.

- Workflow repo & architecture: [https://github.com/yashgoyal5571/pr-auto-reviewer](https://github.com/yashgoyal5571/pr-auto-reviewer)

- Live Demo: [https://github.com/yashgoyal5571/pr-reviewer-test/pulls](https://github.com/yashgoyal5571/pr-reviewer-test/pulls)

**Additional context**
I am happy to submit a PR with just the workflow configuration if you’d like to test this out to help organize the queue!

Non sono identificati file del repository, test o punti di ingresso. Inizia esaminando la pipeline di validazione esistente e il workflow di PR, quindi chiarisci se sono desiderati un'integrazione n8n, controlli Conventional Commits, etichette per la dimensione e riepiloghi su Discord. Il lavoro dovrebbe considerarsi completato quando sarà disponibile una configurazione del workflow concordata e testata che i maintainer possano adottare.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.