Proposal: Integrate PR Auto-Reviewer to add structure and triage visibility

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
I noticed that while the project has a solid validation pipeline, there isn't much automated structure for incoming Pull Requests. Without standardized commit titles or size labels, it can be easy for PRs to slip through the cracks or sit in Draft status for months.

**Describe the solution you'd like**
I built an open-source, n8n-based PR Auto-Reviewer that I believe would be a great lightweight addition to your workflow.
It automatically:

- Checks PR titles against Conventional Commits formatting to keep the history clean.

- Adds size labels (Small/Medium/Large) so you know what can be reviewed quickly.

- Pushes a structured summary to Discord, which helps maintainers keep an eye on queue activity without constantly checking GitHub.

- Workflow repo & architecture: [https://github.com/yashgoyal5571/pr-auto-reviewer](https://github.com/yashgoyal5571/pr-auto-reviewer)

- Live Demo: [https://github.com/yashgoyal5571/pr-reviewer-test/pulls](https://github.com/yashgoyal5571/pr-reviewer-test/pulls)

**Additional context**
I am happy to submit a PR with just the workflow configuration if you’d like to test this out to help organize the queue!

Es ist keine Repository-Datei, kein Test und kein Einstiegspunkt angegeben. Beginne mit der Prüfung der bestehenden Validierungspipeline und des PR-Workflows und kläre anschließend, ob eine n8n-Integration, Prüfungen für Conventional Commits, Größenlabels und Discord-Zusammenfassungen gewünscht sind. Als erledigt sollte gelten, dass eine abgestimmte und getestete Workflow-Konfiguration vorliegt, die Maintainer übernehmen können.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.