cloudnative-pg / cloudnative-pg/plugin-barman-cloud

MEGA S4 + Inconsistent part size

Ouverte
#981 0 commentaires 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub
bug
Langage dominant
Go
Étoiles
191
Forks
72
Merge moyen
2 j 21 h
PR mergées (30 j)
21

Description

Hi,

I've noticed that my backups haven't been working for a while now and I just can't get it to work anymore. I use MEGA S4 as an S3 object storage provider with this configuration

```yaml
apiVersion: barmancloud.cnpg.io/v1
kind: ObjectStore
metadata:
name: my-objectstore-name
namespace: mynamespace
spec:
configuration:
data:
compression: snappy
jobs: 1
destinationPath: s3://my-bucket-name/
endpointURL: https://s3.eu-luxembourg.megas4.com
s3Credentials:
accessKeyId:
key: ACCESS_KEY_ID
name: mega-s3
secretAccessKey:
key: ACCESS_SECRET_KEY
name: mega-s3
wal:
compression: snappy
maxParallel: 1
logLevel: info
retentionPolicyIntervalSeconds: 1800
retentionPolicy: 14d
```

WAL uploads are still working fine. But on-demand backups and scheduled backups are failing with this error message

```
failure uploading data (An error occurred (InvalidPart) when calling the UploadPart operation: Inconsistent part size. S4 requires parts to have the same size (except a smaller size can be allowed for the last part) and consecutive sequential part numbers starting by 1)
```

The full json output

```json
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:07.752576576Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":"2026-06-24 16:48:07,752 [104] ERROR: Backup failed uploading data (An error occurred (InvalidPart) when calling the UploadPart operation: Inconsistent part size. S4 requires parts to have the same size (except a smaller size can be allowed for the last part) and consecutive sequential part numbers starting by 1)","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.893659577Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":"Exception ignored in: ","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.893914989Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":"Traceback (most recent call last):","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.894077144Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" File \"/usr/lib/python3.13/tarfile.py\", line 415, in __del__","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897247336Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" self.close()","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897379955Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" File \"/usr/lib/python3.13/tarfile.py\", line 466, in close","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897399926Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" self.fileobj.write(self.buf)","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897432384Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" File \"/venv/lib/python3.13/site-packages/barman/cloud.py\", line 247, in write","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897481828Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" if self.buffer and self.buffer.tell() > self.chunk_size:","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897539826Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" File \"/usr/lib/python3.13/tempfile.py\", line 690, in func_wrapper","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897543751Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" return func(*args, **kwargs)","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897551773Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":"ValueError: I/O operation on closed file","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
```

I'm pretty sure it has worked in the past. I've been searching a lot, but I haven't been able to find anything that might help me. Does anyone have any ideas? I think this might be something specific to MEGA. Does anyone know of a workaround for this, or has anyone seen something like this before?

Thanks in advance for any advice!

The version of the plugin being used is: **v0.13.0**

Best regards,
Paul

Guide de contribution

Ouvrir le guide de contribution

Piste de recherche

Commencez par inspecter le chemin d’écriture dans barman/cloud.py mentionné dans la trace et le flux d’upload des sauvegardes utilisé par plugin v0.13.0. Reproduisez l’échec avec la configuration ObjectStore fournie et MEGA S4, puis comparez le comportement multipart avec la taille de partie requise par le fournisseur. Le travail est terminé lorsque les sauvegardes à la demande et planifiées sont téléversées avec succès sans interrompre le chemin de téléversement de WAL.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Évaluation

Stack technique
python
Domaine
cloud, databases
Type d'issue
Bug
Difficulté
4/5
Temps estimé
3-5 jours
Activité
Calme
Clarté
À clarifier
Accessibilité débutants
35/100

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.