cloudnative-pg / cloudnative-pg/plugin-barman-cloud

MEGA S4 + Inconsistent part size

Abierto
#981 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub
bug
Lenguaje dominante
Go
Estrellas
191
Forks
72
Merge medio
2 d 21 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
21

Descripción

Hi,

I've noticed that my backups haven't been working for a while now and I just can't get it to work anymore. I use MEGA S4 as an S3 object storage provider with this configuration

```yaml
apiVersion: barmancloud.cnpg.io/v1
kind: ObjectStore
metadata:
name: my-objectstore-name
namespace: mynamespace
spec:
configuration:
data:
compression: snappy
jobs: 1
destinationPath: s3://my-bucket-name/
endpointURL: https://s3.eu-luxembourg.megas4.com
s3Credentials:
accessKeyId:
key: ACCESS_KEY_ID
name: mega-s3
secretAccessKey:
key: ACCESS_SECRET_KEY
name: mega-s3
wal:
compression: snappy
maxParallel: 1
logLevel: info
retentionPolicyIntervalSeconds: 1800
retentionPolicy: 14d
```

WAL uploads are still working fine. But on-demand backups and scheduled backups are failing with this error message

```
failure uploading data (An error occurred (InvalidPart) when calling the UploadPart operation: Inconsistent part size. S4 requires parts to have the same size (except a smaller size can be allowed for the last part) and consecutive sequential part numbers starting by 1)
```

The full json output

```json
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:07.752576576Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":"2026-06-24 16:48:07,752 [104] ERROR: Backup failed uploading data (An error occurred (InvalidPart) when calling the UploadPart operation: Inconsistent part size. S4 requires parts to have the same size (except a smaller size can be allowed for the last part) and consecutive sequential part numbers starting by 1)","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.893659577Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":"Exception ignored in: ","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.893914989Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":"Traceback (most recent call last):","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.894077144Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" File \"/usr/lib/python3.13/tarfile.py\", line 415, in __del__","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897247336Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" self.close()","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897379955Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" File \"/usr/lib/python3.13/tarfile.py\", line 466, in close","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897399926Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" self.fileobj.write(self.buf)","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897432384Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" File \"/venv/lib/python3.13/site-packages/barman/cloud.py\", line 247, in write","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897481828Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" if self.buffer and self.buffer.tell() > self.chunk_size:","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897539826Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" File \"/usr/lib/python3.13/tempfile.py\", line 690, in func_wrapper","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897543751Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":" return func(*args, **kwargs)","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
{"level":"info","ts":"2026-06-24T16:48:08.897551773Z","logger":"barman-cloud-backup","msg":"ValueError: I/O operation on closed file","pipe":"stderr","logging_pod":"my-db-1"}
```

I'm pretty sure it has worked in the past. I've been searching a lot, but I haven't been able to find anything that might help me. Does anyone have any ideas? I think this might be something specific to MEGA. Does anyone know of a workaround for this, or has anyone seen something like this before?

Thanks in advance for any advice!

The version of the plugin being used is: **v0.13.0**

Best regards,
Paul

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Línea de trabajo

Empieza inspeccionando la ruta de escritura de barman/cloud.py mencionada en el traceback y el flujo de subida de backups utilizado por plugin v0.13.0. Reproduce el fallo con la configuración de ObjectStore proporcionada y MEGA S4, y compara después el comportamiento multipart con el tamaño de parte requerido por el proveedor. Se considera terminado cuando las copias de seguridad bajo demanda y programadas se suben correctamente sin romper la ruta de subida de WAL.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Evaluación

Stack tecnológico
python
Área
cloud, databases
Tipo de issue
Error
Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Estado de actividad
Tranquilo
Claridad
Necesita aclaración
Aptitud para principiantes
35/100

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.