bytecodealliance / bytecodealliance/rfcs
Consider adding a section for risk assessment to the RFC template
Open
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 73
- Forks
- 23
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Over in #1, @ggreif [highlighted](https://github.com/bytecodealliance/rfcs/pull/1#discussion_r527914943) that the RFC template doesn't include a section on risk assessment:
> Should a proposal address some pain point, at the cost of potentially introducing other problems, one needs to elaborate the latter, and weigh in on their severity. One could argue that this belongs into the discussion of the proposal, but that thread is not a document.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.