beyondcode / beyondcode/polyscope-community

[Feature]: Ability to request a second-opinion review for generated plans

未关闭
#52 0 条评论 1 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
主要语言
没有语言数据
星标
20
派生
0
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

### Platform

macOS

### Operating system version

macOS 26.3.1

### System architecture

ARM64 (M1, M2, etc)

### PolyScope Version

0.1.0

### Bug description

When a plan is generated, it might be useful to have it reviewed by another AI model or a specialized subagent before execution.

Currently, plans are generated by a single model or agent. Adding the ability to request a second-opinion review on a generated plan would improve the plan quality before implementation or using autopilot.

This review could be performed by:
- another AI model, or
- a specialized subagent (e.g. Security review, UI consistency agent, architecture reviewer).

The reviewing agent would analyze the plan and suggest improvements, risks, or missing steps.

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

调研方向

The issue does not name files, tests, or an entry point for plan generation. Start by locating where generated plans are produced and passed to execution or autopilot, then determine how a second model or specialized subagent could review them. Done means a review can analyze a plan and return improvements, risks, or missing steps before execution.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

领域
ai
Issue 类型
功能
难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
活跃度
停滞
描述清晰度
需要澄清
新手友好度
25/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。