beyondcode / beyondcode/polyscope-community
[Feature]: Ability to request a second-opinion review for generated plans
- 主要语言
- 没有语言数据
- 星标
- 20
- 派生
- 0
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
描述
### Platform
macOS
### Operating system version
macOS 26.3.1
### System architecture
ARM64 (M1, M2, etc)
### PolyScope Version
0.1.0
### Bug description
When a plan is generated, it might be useful to have it reviewed by another AI model or a specialized subagent before execution.
Currently, plans are generated by a single model or agent. Adding the ability to request a second-opinion review on a generated plan would improve the plan quality before implementation or using autopilot.
This review could be performed by:
- another AI model, or
- a specialized subagent (e.g. Security review, UI consistency agent, architecture reviewer).
The reviewing agent would analyze the plan and suggest improvements, risks, or missing steps.
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
调研方向
The issue does not name files, tests, or an entry point for plan generation. Start by locating where generated plans are produced and passed to execution or autopilot, then determine how a second model or specialized subagent could review them. Done means a review can analyze a plan and return improvements, risks, or missing steps before execution.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 领域
- ai
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 新手友好度
- 25/100