bazel-contrib / bazel-contrib/rules_python
bazel coverage produces empty coverage analysis reports and a message about missing GCov when running against a py_test target
- 主要言語
- Starlark
- スター
- 688
- フォーク
- 721
- 平均マージ
- 15時間 7分
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 76
説明
# 🐞 bug report
### Affected Rule
The issue is caused by the rule: py_test()
### Is this a regression?
No
### Description
After the successful execution of the bazel test command I attempted to add the coverage tool too.
Unfortunately, I get output:
GCov does not exist at the given path: ''
Oct 13, 2025 12:50:34 PM com.google.devtools.coverageoutputgenerator.Main runWithArgs
WARNING: There was no coverage found.
I want to use the coverage (opensource) pip package for gathering coverage data of Python tests. I have no clue why running
**bazelisk coverage --combined_report=lcov //... --test_output=all** returns that GCov does not exist.
My test scripts are written with unittest framework, and they successfully run with bazelisk test :all --test_output=all
## 🔬 Minimal Reproduction
https://github.com/TeodorMalbasic/bazel_coverage_target_issue.git
## 🔥 Exception or Error
GCov does not exist at the given path: ''
Oct 13, 2025 12:50:34 PM com.google.devtools.coverageoutputgenerator.Main runWithArgs
WARNING: There was no coverage found.
## 🌍 Your Environment
**Operating System:**
Ubuntu 24.04
**Output of `bazel version`:**
bazel 8.4.2
**Rules_python version:**
Python 3.12.3 on machine, Python 3.12.11 in MODULE.bazel
**Anything else relevant?**
コントリビューションガイド
調査の方向性
Start with the linked minimal reproduction and run `bazelisk coverage --combined_report=lcov //... --test_output=all`, then compare it with the successful `bazelisk test :all --test_output=all` run. Investigate how coverage is invoked for the `py_test()` target; done means the command produces a nonempty coverage analysis report without the missing-GCov warning.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- python
- 領域
- build-system, testing
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 難易度
- 4/5
- 見積もり時間
- 3〜5日
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 28/100