bazel-contrib / bazel-contrib/rules_python
Allow py_wheel to use analysis phase information for attributes
- 主要语言
- Starlark
- 星标
- 688
- 派生
- 721
- 平均合并
- 15 小时 7 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 76
描述
# 🚀 feature request
### Relevant Rules
`py_wheel`
### Description
When building a wheel with `py_wheel`, some attributes are closely tied to the Python runtime the wheel is intended for. For example, building a wheel with a C extension can require a `python_tag` value that has the python version as part of the abi tag.
Because e.g. `py_wheel.python_tag` takes a string, the only way to pass a value is to use a select() expression to map some condition to a raw string. This is tedious, to say the least. It's also problematic for constructing the `cp39` string -- there's no flag that captures the runtime implementation name ("cp"), so creating a select for this is tough (though, still possible with some tricks, see below).
I _think_ a workaround here is to combine toolchain lookup with FeatureFlagInfo. Have a custom rule look up the toolchain and return e.g. implementation_name in FeatureFlagInfo. Have a config_setting map that to true/false. Have a select() expression map the config setting to e.g. "cp39". Complicated and verbose, but I think it would work.
### Describe the solution you'd like
It'd be better if py_wheel either inferred the values from the toolchain, or provided a way to feed analysis phase information in for value.
The loose idea I have is to have an label attribute that accepts e.g. PyWheelInfo provider, and then users can populate that with what they choose. We'd provide a default impl that did the common thing.
贡献指南
调研方向
从 py_wheel 规则开始,重点关注 python_tag 以及这里描述的分析阶段工具链信息。确定推断还是 PyWheelInfo 输入更适合支持运行时派生的属性;完成的标准是用户可以提供实现/版本标签等值,而无需使用当前冗长的 select() 变通方案。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- build-system
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 35/100