aws-samples / aws-samples/sample-autonomous-cloud-coding-agents
agent: block integration trigger labels from agent write-back
- 主要言語
- TypeScript
- スター
- 143
- フォーク
- 46
- 平均マージ
- 3日 10時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 24
説明
### Component
Agent (Python runtime)
### Describe the feature
Prevent the agent from setting **integration trigger labels** that would re-fire webhooks and spawn duplicate tasks (infinite loop / cost blow-up).
Known trigger surfaces today:
| Integration | Default trigger | Set by |
|-------------|-----------------|--------|
| Jira | `bgagent` label | User / automation |
| Linear | `bgagent` label | User / automation |
| Future GitHub label channel | TBD (e.g. `bgagent`) | User only |
Enforcement:
1. **PreToolUse / Cedar hard-deny** on issue-write tools when `labels` includes the configured trigger label for that task's source integration.
2. **Allowlist** of agent-set labels: progress/status labels only (e.g. `agent:implementing`, `agent:pr-created`, `agent:error`) — configurable per integration in Blueprint.
3. **Fail-closed** if task metadata does not include `trigger_label` when issue-write tools are allowed.
### Use case
Linear and Jira processors fire on **label added** events. If the agent posts comments and accidentally (or via prompt injection) re-applies the trigger label, the platform may enqueue another full task against the same issue — unbounded cost and race conditions.
### Proposed solution
1. Extend task hydration context with `trigger_label` and `allowed_agent_labels` from repo Blueprint / integration mapping.
2. Add Cedar policy module `builtin/trigger_label_governance` or extend deterministic PreToolUse regex guards for MCP `update_issue` / label payloads.
3. Mirror check in Jira/Linear outbound clients if agents call REST directly.
4. Tests: agent policy tests + handler tests for webhook processor dedup (label must be *newly added*, not re-saved — already true for Jira; document same for agent writes).
5. Document operator guidance: restrict who can apply trigger labels on public repos.
### Other information
- Related: `docs/guides/JIRA_SETUP_GUIDE.md`, Linear mapping construct, #389 (platform trigger expansion), #230 (event governance RFC).
- Complements webhook dedup logic in `jira-webhook-processor.ts` / `linear-webhook-processor.ts` (ingress dedup does not stop agent write-back).
- Out of scope: changing default trigger label names (backward compatible).
### Acknowledgements
- [x] I may be able to implement this feature
- [ ] This might be a breaking change
コントリビューションガイド
調査の方向性
PreToolUse/Cedar の issue-write 強制適用と、指定された jira-webhook-processor.ts および linear-webhook-processor.ts のパスから始めます。関連する JIRA_SETUP_GUIDE.md、Linear のマッピング構造、agent policy と handler のテストを確認します。完了条件は、agent による write で trigger labels がブロックされ、許可された labels は設定可能なままであり、trigger metadata がない場合は fail closed し、webhook の重複排除動作がカバーされていることです。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- python, typescript
- 領域
- backend-api-design, security
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 静か
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 38/100