apalis-dev / apalis-dev/apalis-postgres
Release rc.9, migration isolation (apalis._sqlx_migrations), it's on main but unreleased
- 主要語言
- Rust
- 星號
- 9
- 分支
- 13
- PR 合併指標
- 30 天內沒有已合併 PR
描述
The README on `main` documents migration tracking in `apalis._sqlx_migrations` via `sqlx.toml`, but the latest published crate (`1.0.0-rc.8`, sqlx 0.8) still migrates against the default `public._sqlx_migrations`.
Any app tracking its own migrations with sqlx (e.g. sqlx-cli) collides with `setup()` or whichever migrator runs second fails.
## Repro
Our migrations run first `sqlx database drop && sqlx database create && sqlx migrate run && cargo run` returns
```
2026-09-13T17:06:08.170485Z INFO heirloom_backend::app: Redis client configured
2026-09-13T17:06:08.171076Z INFO sqlx::postgres::notice: relation "_sqlx_migrations" already exists, skipping
thread 'main' (677167) panicked at src/app.rs:105:10:
failed to run apalis migrations: Migrate(VersionMissing(20260513185704))
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
```
When reversed, i.e own migrations are run last `sqlx database drop && sqlx database create && cargo run && sqlx migrate run`
```bash
error: migration 20220530084123 was previously applied but is missing in the resolved migrations
```
## Suggested
Relase the rc containing the `apalis._sqlx_migrations` isolation (works when using the git crate i.e `apalis-postgres = { git = "https://github.com/apalis-dev/apalis-postgres" }`).
This should also align with what the Readme suggests, and also the wording concerning the pre-1 and how migrations happen could be made tighter and less vague. e.g does *fresh* mean an empty DB, or a DB without pre-v1.0 apalis history? It's ambiguous for anyone migrating an existing app database
貢獻指南
這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南
評估
這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。