apalis-dev / apalis-dev/apalis-postgres
Release rc.9, migration isolation (apalis._sqlx_migrations), it's on main but unreleased
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 9
- Forks
- 13
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
The README on `main` documents migration tracking in `apalis._sqlx_migrations` via `sqlx.toml`, but the latest published crate (`1.0.0-rc.8`, sqlx 0.8) still migrates against the default `public._sqlx_migrations`.
Any app tracking its own migrations with sqlx (e.g. sqlx-cli) collides with `setup()` or whichever migrator runs second fails.
## Repro
Our migrations run first `sqlx database drop && sqlx database create && sqlx migrate run && cargo run` returns
```
2026-09-13T17:06:08.170485Z INFO heirloom_backend::app: Redis client configured
2026-09-13T17:06:08.171076Z INFO sqlx::postgres::notice: relation "_sqlx_migrations" already exists, skipping
thread 'main' (677167) panicked at src/app.rs:105:10:
failed to run apalis migrations: Migrate(VersionMissing(20260513185704))
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
```
When reversed, i.e own migrations are run last `sqlx database drop && sqlx database create && cargo run && sqlx migrate run`
```bash
error: migration 20220530084123 was previously applied but is missing in the resolved migrations
```
## Suggested
Relase the rc containing the `apalis._sqlx_migrations` isolation (works when using the git crate i.e `apalis-postgres = { git = "https://github.com/apalis-dev/apalis-postgres" }`).
This should also align with what the Readme suggests, and also the wording concerning the pre-1 and how migrations happen could be made tighter and less vague. e.g does *fresh* mean an empty DB, or a DB without pre-v1.0 apalis history? It's ambiguous for anyone migrating an existing app database
Guía de contribución
No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio
Evaluación
Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.