apache / apache/servicecomb-java-chassis

微服务调用耗时问题咨询

Open
#3,523 5 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
Dominant language
Java
Stars
1.9k
Forks
814
Avg merge
8d 23h
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

调用过程nlsb -> edge (服务A) -> provider(服务B),存在部分(万分之几十) provider 响应只有10ms, 但是edge响应时间800ms左右的请求。edge本身几乎没有处理业务。 类似日志如下
调用时间:2022-12-13 16:24:46.975
一、edge日志:
1. 调用日志
**2022-12-13 16:24:46.975**|transport-vert.x-eventloop-thread-1|DEBUG|LoadBalancerContext.java:getServerFromLoadBalancer:492|c225268d-1e24-4a93-b579-8c15eaa8ae7c|default using LB returned Server: rest://182.10.xx.xxx:8080?sslEnabled=true for request null
2. access.log
2022-12-13 16:24:46.973|182.10.xxx.0=xx|"POST /rtd/kbz_fraud_prevention/kbz_fraud_prevention/P2P_Verify/1.0/verify HTTP/1.1"|200|c225268d-1e24-4a93-b579-8c15eaa8ae7c|**823**

二、provider日志access.log
**2022-12-13 16:24:46.976**|182.10.xx.xxx|"POST /risk-api/v1/kbz_fraud_prevention/P2P_Verify/predict HTTP/1.1"|200|c225268d-1e24-4a93-b579-8c15eaa8ae7c|**10**

edge的CPU及内存使用都不足50%
可能是什么原因导致的呢?

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

Research direction

Start by comparing the timestamps and request ID in the edge and provider access logs, then inspect LoadBalancerContext.java around getServerFromLoadBalancer. Trace the interval between the provider response and edge completion using the existing logs. Done means documenting a confirmed cause for the latency gap and the evidence supporting it.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
java
Domain
backend, distributed-systems
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.