Controlling memory utilization by ParquetReader
- 主要言語
- Java
- スター
- 3.1k
- フォーク
- 1.6k
- 平均マージ
- 3日 12時間
- マージ済み PR(30日)
- 33
説明
In Apache Druid, Parquet is one of the popular form of input source to ingest data into a druid cluster (https://druid.apache.org/docs/latest/development/extensions-core/parquet.html). We rely on the parquet-mr library to read the parquet files and then convert them into Druid native format row-for-row to ingest. A considerable amount of our usecases ingest the whole parquet files (ie all columns in a single shot) into the system.
A challenge that we face is that the parquet reader loads up an entire row group into memory as part of its normal operation. Row groups can be quite large (like, 1GB large) and sometimes it creates a pressure on our reader JVM leading to OOMs. Further, in some other cases it ends up creating GC pressure on the JVM leading to a decrease in the throughput of the ingestion tasks.
To mitigate this problem, we are considering that would it be better to have an option to download the Parquet rowgroup/file first and memory-map it for reading? The code which buffers the rowgroup works on the ByteBuffer interface already (https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/blob/master/parquet-hadoop/src/main/java/org/apache/parquet/hadoop/ParquetFileReader.java#L1763), so it seems like it could compliment the MMappedByteBuffer implementation too. Such a thing would alleviate pressure off of our reader JVM there by heavily reducing the chances for OOMs.
We're very open to more ideas or already tried solutions around this problem.
**Reporter**: [Rohan Garg](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=rohangarg)
**Note**: *This issue was originally created as [PARQUET-2141](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2141). Please see the [migration documentation](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2502) for further details.*
コントリビューションガイド
このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません
調査の方向性
parquet-hadoop/src/main/java/org/apache/parquet/hadoop/ParquetFileReader.java の 1763 行目付近から始め、行グループのバッファリングで ByteBuffer がどのように使用されているかを調査します。提案されている MMappedByteBuffer のアプローチを現在の動作と比較して評価し、その後、取り込み結果を変更せずに JVM メモリと GC の負荷を削減する、合意された解決策を定義して検証します。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 技術スタック
- java
- 領域
- performance
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 25/100