Question on parquet-protobuf and parquet-pig

Hi,

I have a question about protobuf to parquet conversion.
I have a message like this (simplified) :
```Java

message MyMessage {
repeated string language = 1;
}
```

parquet-protobuf convert it to the following schema :

```Java
message MyMessage {
repeated binary language (UTF8);
}
```

But, according to TestPigSchameConverter.java, the correct schema should be :

```Java
message MyMessage {
optional group language (LIST) {
repeated binary value (UTF8);
}
}
```

Language is an optional list of language, i want to store zero or more language.

Who have the correct schema for my case ? parquet-protobuf or parquet-pig ?

**Reporter**: [Christian Nguyen Van Than](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=cnguyen@nextperf.com)

_{**Note**: *This issue was originally created as [PARQUET-354](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-354). Please see the [migration documentation](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2502) for further details.*}

Confronta il comportamento di conversione di protobuf con lo schema previsto in TestPigSchameConverter.java, iniziando da come parquet-protobuf e parquet-pig rappresentano i campi string ripetuti. Determina se gli schemi differiscono erroneamente per zero o più valori e documenta una conclusione riproducibile o un test che stabilisca quale rappresentazione sia corretta.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.