Consider adding checks that validate eq(null) / notEq(null) is not used on a required column in the filter2 API
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 3.1k
- Forks
- 1.6k
- Avg merge
- 3d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 33
Description
Is this too strict?
**Reporter**: [Alex Levenson](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=alexlevenson) / @isnotinvain
**Note**: *This issue was originally created as [PARQUET-44](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-44). Please see the [migration documentation](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2502) for further details.*
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by locating the filter2 API handling for eq(null) and notEq(null), along with how required columns are represented. Clarify whether rejecting these cases is intended, then define tests that establish the accepted behavior for required columns before implementing any validation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- api
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100