Outdated operation precedence.

Here's an expression: `SELECT ~1 + 2`. If you plug it into `PostgreSQL` interpreter, here's what the output looks like:
```
postgres=# select ~1 + 2;
?column?
----------
-4
(1 row)

postgres=# select ~(1 + 2);
?column?
----------
-4
(1 row)

postgres=# select (~1) + 2;
?column?
----------
0
(1 row)
```
As you can see here, and according to [operation precedence](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-syntax-lexical.html#SQL-PRECEDENCE) listed in documentation, the `+` operation is more powerful than the `~` operation, and thus we have PGBitwiseNot(1 + 2). However, if we plug this into the parser, we get the following AST:
```
...
projection: [
UnnamedExpr(
BinaryOp {
left: UnaryOp {
op: PGBitwiseNot,
expr: Value(
Number(
"1",
false,
),
),
},
op: Plus,
right: Value(
Number(
"2",
false,
),
),
},
),
],
...
```
Which is implying `(~1) + 2` instead of `~(1 + 2)`. This should be fixed.

**UPDATE:**
In code, I found a reference to an old [PostgreSQL precedence table](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.0/operators.htm#AEN2026), using which the parser is built. However, this table is for a very old (`7.0`, released `May 8, 2000`) version of PostgreSQL. There latest version is `15.1`. Shouldn't this be updated?

Start by reading the parser's referenced PostgreSQL 7.0 precedence table and the current PostgreSQL precedence documentation linked in the issue. Compare the parser's AST for `SELECT ~1 + 2` with the documented behavior and the three example queries. Done means the parser applies the intended precedence and produces the corresponding AST.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.