Private vlans on a shared network not working correctly

### problem

Trying to use a shared network with private vlans and the VMs were unable to ping their default gateway in testing. On investigation this turns out to be an issue with the OVS tables.

Primary vlan - 301
Isolated vlan - 302

The hypervisors use cloudbr1 which is trunk link for all guest + public traffic. All hypervisors have both vlans (301 and 302) allowed on that trunk link.

The primary vlan's L3 interface is an SVI on a Cisco switch. The Cisco switch has the correct private vlan configuration. The hypervisors can ping the L3 interface IP.

When an instance is created in this shared network it successfully gets an IP but is unable to ping the L3 interface IP. The Cisco switch shows the correct mac address of the VM NIC in it's arp table so communication to the switch is working but the return traffic is getting dropped by the OVS switch.

Looking at the OVS flow rules on the hypervisor running the VM (with some help from ai) -

root@hv2:~# ovs-ofctl dump-flows cloudbr1 | grep "dl_vlan=301"
cookie=0x0, duration=680.753s, table=0, n_packets=635, n_bytes=40640, idle_age=0, priority=200,arp,dl_vlan=301,arp_tpa=172.30.12.70 actions=strip_vlan,resubmit(,1)
cookie=0x0, duration=680.739s, table=0, n_packets=2, n_bytes=692, idle_age=659, priority=100,udp,dl_vlan=301,nw_dst=255.255.255.255,tp_dst=67 actions=strip_vlan,resubmit(,1)
cookie=0x0, duration=680.667s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=680, priority=70,dl_vlan=301,dl_dst=1e:01:26:00:00:c2 actions=strip_vlan,resubmit(,1)
cookie=0x0, duration=674.094s, table=0, n_packets=105, n_bytes=6720, idle_age=21, priority=70,dl_vlan=301,dl_dst=1e:01:9d:00:00:e8 actions=strip_vlan,resubmit(,1)
cookie=0x0, duration=673.872s, table=0, n_packets=731, n_bytes=46784, idle_age=0, priority=70,dl_vlan=301,dl_dst=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff actions=strip_vlan,group:301
cookie=0x0, duration=680.660s, table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=680, priority=70,dl_vlan=301,dl_dst=1e:01:26:00:00:c2 actions=strip_vlan,output:42
cookie=0x0, duration=674.088s, table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=674, priority=70,dl_vlan=301,dl_dst=1e:01:9d:00:00:e8 actions=strip_vlan,output:43
cookie=0x0, duration=673.865s, table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=680, priority=70,dl_vlan=301,dl_dst=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff actions=strip_vlan,group:4397

relevant lines -

cookie=0x0, duration=674.094s, table=0, n_packets=105, n_bytes=6720, idle_age=21, priority=70,dl_vlan=301,dl_dst=1e:01:9d:00:00:e8 actions=strip_vlan,resubmit(,1)
cookie=0x0, duration=674.088s, table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=674, priority=70,dl_vlan=301,dl_dst=1e:01:9d:00:00:e8 actions=strip_vlan,output:43

table 0 has 105 matches but it is stripping the vlan 301 so when it gets to table 1 there are no matches and the default action at the end is to drop.

The solution was to add this to test -

ovs-ofctl add-flow cloudbr1 "table=1,priority=80,dl_dst=1e:01:9d:00:00:e8,actions=output:43" to match the untagged packet and send it to the VM.

Once this was added the VM could now ping it's default gateway on the Cisco switch.

But this was just a quick fix to test if that was the issue. The suggestion is that there is an issue with the matching or rewrite rules that need modifying in the code.

### versions

Cloudstack 4.22.1.0, hypervisors running Ubuntu 22.04, NFS primary and secondary storage

OVS switch version - OVS version : 2.17.9

### The steps to reproduce the bug

1. Create a shared network with a primary and isolated vlan.
2. Create an instance in the new shared network
3. Try to ping the default gateway
...

### What to do about it?

_No response_

Tái hiện trường hợp private VLAN trong shared network bằng các bước được liệt kê, sau đó truy vết quá trình tạo OVS flow của CloudStack cho hypervisor bị ảnh hưởng. Kiểm tra các rule trong table 0 và table 1 liên quan đến việc loại bỏ VLAN và MAC đích của VM. Được xem là hoàn tất khi lưu lượng trả về đến gateway của VM mà không cần thêm thủ công một flow không gắn thẻ vào table 1.

Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.