[Java] Adapt to Java 9/9+ automatic module system
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Java
- Sterne
- 94
- Forks
- 152
- Ø Merge
- 3 T. 16 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 11
Beschreibung
In Java 9/9+, within following module-info.java definition the build will fail by error:
```Java
module my.app {
exports my.app;
requires arrow.memory.core;
requires arrow.memory.unsafe;
}
```
The error:
> java: the unnamed module reads package org.apache.arrow.memory from both arrow.memory.core and arrow.memory.unsafe
It seems that JPMS requires a package to be read from at most one individual module. Ref: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/spec/sotms/#the-module-path. If so what we may have to do is to conduct a code clean up for our maven modules to make sure we don't populate codes in the same package into different libraries.
Also, as a more standardized practice, it's might be an option to put entries with name **Automatic-Module-Name** into manifest files to tell automatic module system to generate predefined module names rather than parsing from jar file name. Ref: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/lang/module/ModuleFinder.html#automatic-modules
Note that it's not a goal for this topic to migrate to Java 9/9+.
**Reporter**: [Hongze Zhang](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12905) / @zhztheplayer
**Note**: *This issue was originally created as [ARROW-12905](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12905). Please see the [migration documentation](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/14542) for further details.*
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Start with the module-info.java example and the Maven modules that provide org.apache.arrow.memory, then review the linked migration documentation and JPMS references. Check how packages are split between arrow.memory.core and arrow.memory.unsafe and how manifest files are produced. Done means the duplicate-package failure is addressed and automatic module names are defined where appropriate without migrating the project to Java 9+.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- java
- Bereich
- build-system
- Issue-Typ
- Refactoring
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 20/100