[Java] Avro - Experiment with "compiled" consumer delegates for performance.

All consumers that rely on delegates (e.g. struct, composite, list, union, ...) require  megamorphic lookups which can't be inlined well by JIT.  

We should verify the performance different of a hand-coded consumer vs an existing delegate consumer

i.e. something like:

void consume(Decoder d) {

  ((IntConsumer)delegate).consume(d);

}

compared to the existing implementation.  It is expected we will see a decent amount of performance improvement from this approach.  If we do, we should add an option to converter to generate new custom classes on the fly, that mimic the hand-coded option.

**Reporter**: [Micah Kornfield](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6595) / @emkornfield

_{**Note**: *This issue was originally created as [ARROW-6595](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6595). Please see the [migration documentation](https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/14542) for further details.*}

Comienza localizando los consumers basados en delegados y la ruta del consumer codificada manualmente que se describen en el issue. Compara su rendimiento y, después, evalúa si están justificadas las clases personalizadas generadas por un converter; se considera terminado cuando haya una comparación documentada y una decisión de implementación acotada.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.