anthropics / anthropics/claude-code
[Bug][cyber] Safeguard block when reading local documentation files for terminology updates (req_011Cee2j79v2s4YxEMLDm7wT)
- 主要言語
- Python
- スター
- 145k
- フォーク
- 23.1k
- PR マージ指標
- PR 指標を取得中
説明
**Triage:** kind `cyber` · domain `offensive-pentest` · flagging model `Opus 4.8` · severity **session-halted** (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
**Type:** Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · **Work domain (heuristic):** `offensive-pentest`
### Why this is a false positive
The cyber safeguard triggered on request ID req_011Cee2j79v2s4YxEMLDm7wT while the assistant inspected local documentation files to catalog existing terms. The task involved reading local repository text files to reword documentation into standardized enterprise terminology. Flagging passive file reads during documentation updates halts routine repository maintenance.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred **1×** across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-02T05:05:36.391Z.
### Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
- `req_011Cee2j79v2s4YxEMLDm7wT` (2026-09-02T05:05:36.391Z)
### In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
### Block message
> API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude
Details: `[cyber]`
Request ID: req_011Cee2j79v2s4YxEMLDm7wT
**Environment:** Claude Code, Linux. · **Work domain:** `offensive-pentest`
---
🔎 Filed automatically by [ClAudit v2.2.5](https://github.com/sworrl/ClAudit) — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.
コントリビューションガイド
このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません
調査の方向性
No repository file, test, or code entry point is named. Start by reviewing the cited Request ID and the Claude Code safeguard behavior; done would mean confirming whether passive local-documentation reads are incorrectly blocked and recording a reproducible outcome.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
評価
- 領域
- documentation, security
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 活発さ
- 活発
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 25/100