anthropics / anthropics/claude-code
Single code-review at high effort using Fable 5.1 blows through entire session budget at $100/month subscription level without completing
- Ngôn ngữ chính
- Python
- Star
- 145k
- Fork
- 23.1k
- Chỉ số merge pull request
- Chỉ số pull request đang chờ
Mô tả
**Bug Description**
The licensing model for Anthropic at the $100/month level is just horrible compared to OpenAI at the same level. With OpenAI, I no longer have session limits at that level - just weekly limits. I also can use as much Astra as I like. With Fable 5.1, attempting to do a single code-review at high level rapidly blows through my entire session budget without actually finishing the review and blows through my tokens with no benefit. This is a horrible customer experience.
This is the 3rd time this has happened to me recently, where my session usage is relatively low on the order of 20%. I attempt to get Fable 5.1 to do a `/code-review high` for something where about 1k lines have changed across about 15 to 20 files. Claude code rapidly spins up on the order of 8 sub-agents and blows through my entire current session budget without actually finishing the code review and shoots up my weekly usage for Fable by about 20% in the process without having achieved any useful work.
My experience with OpenAI and Astra in this regard is infinitely superior. Please fix this.
**Environment Info**
- Platform: darwin
- Terminal: tmux
- Version: 2.1.269
- Feedback ID: 9693665a-2d7b-47ec-a0e5-7e1a7d414002
**Errors**
```json
[]
```
For comparison, a single `/review` in Codex CLI using Astra at high on the identical code changes uses less than 1% of my weekly token budget at the $100/month subscription level. Something feels badly misconfigured or miscalibrated on your end.
NOTE: This same problem does **NOT** exist when using Opus 5 for `/code-review high` instead of using Fable 5.1, hence I do not believe the problem lies solely with the `code-review` skill.
Hướng dẫn đóng góp
Chưa lập chỉ mục được hướng dẫn đóng góp cho kho mã nguồn này
Hướng nghiên cứu
Start by reproducing `/code-review high` on Fable 5.1 with about 1,000 changed lines across 15–20 files on darwin in tmux, then compare it with Opus 5. Inspect session and weekly usage during the run; done means the review completes without exhausting the session budget or consuming disproportionate tokens.
Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.
Đánh giá
- Lĩnh vực
- ai, devtools
- Loại issue
- Lỗi
- Độ khó
- 5/5
- Thời gian dự kiến
- Hơn một tuần
- Mức độ hoạt động
- Sôi nổi
- Độ rõ ràng
- Cần làm rõ
- Mức phù hợp với người mới
- 25/100