anthropics / anthropics/claude-code

Single code-review at high effort using Fable 5.1 blows through entire session budget at $100/month subscription level without completing

Đang mở
#93,894 2 bình luận 0 reaction 0 người được giao Xem trên GitHub
area:cost area:skills bug platform:macos
Ngôn ngữ chính
Python
Star
145k
Fork
23.1k
Chỉ số merge pull request
Chỉ số pull request đang chờ

Mô tả

**Bug Description**
The licensing model for Anthropic at the $100/month level is just horrible compared to OpenAI at the same level. With OpenAI, I no longer have session limits at that level - just weekly limits. I also can use as much Astra as I like. With Fable 5.1, attempting to do a single code-review at high level rapidly blows through my entire session budget without actually finishing the review and blows through my tokens with no benefit. This is a horrible customer experience.

This is the 3rd time this has happened to me recently, where my session usage is relatively low on the order of 20%. I attempt to get Fable 5.1 to do a `/code-review high` for something where about 1k lines have changed across about 15 to 20 files. Claude code rapidly spins up on the order of 8 sub-agents and blows through my entire current session budget without actually finishing the code review and shoots up my weekly usage for Fable by about 20% in the process without having achieved any useful work.

My experience with OpenAI and Astra in this regard is infinitely superior. Please fix this.

**Environment Info**
- Platform: darwin
- Terminal: tmux
- Version: 2.1.269
- Feedback ID: 9693665a-2d7b-47ec-a0e5-7e1a7d414002

**Errors**
```json
[]
```

For comparison, a single `/review` in Codex CLI using Astra at high on the identical code changes uses less than 1% of my weekly token budget at the $100/month subscription level. Something feels badly misconfigured or miscalibrated on your end.

NOTE: This same problem does **NOT** exist when using Opus 5 for `/code-review high` instead of using Fable 5.1, hence I do not believe the problem lies solely with the `code-review` skill.

Hướng dẫn đóng góp

Chưa lập chỉ mục được hướng dẫn đóng góp cho kho mã nguồn này

Hướng nghiên cứu

Start by reproducing `/code-review high` on Fable 5.1 with about 1,000 changed lines across 15–20 files on darwin in tmux, then compare it with Opus 5. Inspect session and weekly usage during the run; done means the review completes without exhausting the session budget or consuming disproportionate tokens.

Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.

Đánh giá

Lĩnh vực
ai, devtools
Loại issue
Lỗi
Độ khó
5/5
Thời gian dự kiến
Hơn một tuần
Mức độ hoạt động
Sôi nổi
Độ rõ ràng
Cần làm rõ
Mức phù hợp với người mới
25/100

Nhận issue mới trong hộp thư của bạn

Bản tóm tắt ngắn những issue GitHub phù hợp với người mới.