Claude review fails on PRs from forks

**Describe the bug**
When submitting a PR from a fork, with the `claude-code-review.yml` set up by the wizard in claude, it fails with the following:
```
error: Error message: Unable to get ACTIONS_ID_TOKEN_REQUEST_URL env variable
```

**Workflow yml file**
If it's not sensitive, consider including a paste of your full Claude workflow.yml file.

**API Provider**

[x] Anthropic First-Party API (default)
[ ] AWS Bedrock
[ ] GCP Vertex

**Additional context**
workflow file"

```
name: Claude Code Review

on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize]
# Optional: Only run on specific file changes
# paths:
# - "src/**/*.ts"
# - "src/**/*.tsx"
# - "src/**/*.js"
# - "src/**/*.jsx"

jobs:
claude-review:
# Optional: Filter by PR author
# if: |
# github.event.pull_request.user.login == 'external-contributor' ||
# github.event.pull_request.user.login == 'new-developer' ||
# github.event.pull_request.author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR'

runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: read
issues: read
id-token: write

steps:
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 1

- name: Run Claude Code Review
id: claude-review
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@beta
with:
claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}

# Optional: Specify model (defaults to Claude Sonnet 4, uncomment for Claude Opus 4)
# model: "claude-opus-4-20250514"

# Direct prompt for automated review (no @claude mention needed)
direct_prompt: |
Please review this pull request and provide feedback on:
- Code quality and best practices
- Potential bugs or issues
- Performance considerations
- Security concerns
- Test coverage

Be constructive and helpful in your feedback.

# Optional: Use sticky comments to make Claude reuse the same comment on subsequent pushes to the same PR
# use_sticky_comment: true

# Optional: Customize review based on file types
# direct_prompt: |
# Review this PR focusing on:
# - For TypeScript files: Type safety and proper interface usage
# - For API endpoints: Security, input validation, and error handling
# - For React components: Performance, accessibility, and best practices
# - For tests: Coverage, edge cases, and test quality

# Optional: Different prompts for different authors
# direct_prompt: |
# ${{ github.event.pull_request.author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR' &&
# 'Welcome! Please review this PR from a first-time contributor. Be encouraging and provide detailed explanations for any suggestions.' ||
# 'Please provide a thorough code review focusing on our coding standards and best practices.' }}

# Optional: Add specific tools for running tests or linting
# allowed_tools: "Bash(npm run test),Bash(npm run lint),Bash(npm run typecheck)"

# Optional: Skip review for certain conditions
# if: |
# !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[skip-review]') &&
# !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[WIP]')

```