Managed alternative to this repo — would you add a README mention?

Hi Kimmo,

I've been a fan of url-to-pdf-api for a while — it's exactly the right approach to PDF generation, and 7k stars + 782 forks speak for themselves.

I noticed maintenance has slowed down and there are still deployment issues being filed (Railway crashes, sandbox flags, etc). Users clearly still need this.

I built Renderly (https://renderlyapi.com) — essentially a hosted, managed version of what this repo does. Same Chromium rendering, but as a REST API with no infrastructure to manage. Free tier available.

Two things I wanted to ask:

1. Would you be open to adding a line in the README pointing users to Renderly as a managed alternative? Something like: "Looking for a hosted version? Check out [Renderly](https://renderlyapi.com)." I'd be happy to offer a free Pro account in exchange.
2. Any feedback on the API design from someone who's thought deeply about this problem would be genuinely valuable.
Either way — great work on this repo. It's clearly been useful to a lot of people and it's what inspired part of Renderly's approach.

— Diogo
https://renderlyapi.com