alex / alex/rply

What is the equivalent of PLY's "def t_FOO(t): ..."?

Ouverte
#15 1 commentaire 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub
Langage dominant
Python
Étoiles
391
Forks
62
Métriques de merge des PR
Aucune PR mergée en 30 j

Description

In a PLY lexer, I can implement certain weird things such as case-insensitive keywords by defining a function with the same name as I'd normally give the string variable containing the regexp for that token.

For example:

```
from ply import lex

tokens = ("GREET", "FIGHT", "WORD")
reserved = ("GREET", "FIGHT")

t_ignore = ' +'

def t_error(t):
raise ValueError("oh noooo")

def t_WORD(t):
"[a-zA-Z]+"
upper = t.value.upper()
if upper in reserved:
t.value = upper
t.type = upper
return t

lexer = lex.lex()
lexer.input("grEEt samuel FIGHT tomato greet potato FIght pOEtRY")
for token in lexer:
print token

#LexToken(GREET,'GREET',1,0)
#LexToken(WORD,'samuel',1,6)
#LexToken(FIGHT,'FIGHT',1,13)
#LexToken(WORD,'tomato',1,19)
#LexToken(GREET,'GREET',1,26)
#LexToken(WORD,'potato',1,32)
#LexToken(FIGHT,'FIGHT',1,39)
#LexToken(WORD,'pOEtRY',1,45)
```

I can't find anything in rply's documentation that explains how to do the equivalent of defining t_WORD as a function in the above program. Nor can I find anything that indicates that it can't be done.

Guide de contribution

Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt

Évaluation

Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.