Isn't section 5.1 "Use object destructuring" conflicting with 3.3 "Use object method shorthand" ?

In section 5.1 it is stated the following:

> Use object destructuring when accessing and using multiple properties of an object.

In section 3.3, it is stated the following:

> Use object method shorthand.

Let's look at the following example:

```js
const foo = {
bar: 5,
// applying 3.3
computeSomething() {
return this.bar + 5;
}
};

// applying 5.1
const {bar, computeSomething} = foo;

console.log(bar);

computeSomething();
```

The last instruction throws the following error:

> TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'bar')

So, applying both 3.3 and 5.1 can lead to an incorrect code. Either we have to use arrow functions in objects definition; or we have to not use destructuring; but both 3.3 and 5.1 can't be recommended together without creating potential issues. At least, that's what I'm feeling.

What do you think? Did I miss the point or a clarification in the specs about that?

Read sections 3.3 and 5.1 of the style guide, then reproduce the object-method and destructuring example from the issue. Check the comment discussion for an agreed interpretation and document a clear, non-conflicting recommendation, with an example showing when the guidance applies. Done means the two sections no longer suggest unsafe combined usage.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.