Chapter 5, Excercise 10
- Linguagem predominante
- Jupyter Notebook
- Estrelas
- 30k
- Forks
- 13.1k
- Métricas de merge de PRs
- Nenhum PR com merge em 30d
Descrição
Hello,
to complete this exercise I directly implemented LinearSVC into the coding of Chapter 2.
As data I used `housing_prepared` and as labels I used `housing_labels`.
In the end I just trained the SVM regressor like that:
```
svm_reg = LinearSVR(random_state=42)
svm_reg.fit(housing_prepared, housing_labels)
```
The score is quite unusual (compared to RandomForest and Linear Regression):
```
housing_predictions = svm_reg.predict(housing_prepared)
svm_reg_mse = mean_squared_error(housing_labels, housing_predictions)
svm_reg_rmse = np.sqrt(svm_reg_mse)
svm_reg_rmse
218339.15956036837
```
Why is it so badly underfitting the data? Why is the error in the exercise 10 so much lower, although the data should be more or less the same (Housing_prepared additionally is scaled, uses the imputer and the OneHotEncoder for Ocean Aprox. and adds some attributes).
thanks
Guia de contribuição
Nenhum guia de contribuição indexado para este repositório
Avaliação
Esta issue ainda não foi avaliada.