Chapter 5, Excercise 10
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Jupyter Notebook
- Sterne
- 30k
- Forks
- 13.1k
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
Hello,
to complete this exercise I directly implemented LinearSVC into the coding of Chapter 2.
As data I used `housing_prepared` and as labels I used `housing_labels`.
In the end I just trained the SVM regressor like that:
```
svm_reg = LinearSVR(random_state=42)
svm_reg.fit(housing_prepared, housing_labels)
```
The score is quite unusual (compared to RandomForest and Linear Regression):
```
housing_predictions = svm_reg.predict(housing_prepared)
svm_reg_mse = mean_squared_error(housing_labels, housing_predictions)
svm_reg_rmse = np.sqrt(svm_reg_mse)
svm_reg_rmse
218339.15956036837
```
Why is it so badly underfitting the data? Why is the error in the exercise 10 so much lower, although the data should be more or less the same (Housing_prepared additionally is scaled, uses the imputer and the OneHotEncoder for Ocean Aprox. and adds some attributes).
thanks
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Bewertung
Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.