acl-org / acl-org/reviewer-paper-matching
NAACL 2021 trying to run COI/reviewer assignments
- Ngôn ngữ chính
- Python
- Star
- 26
- Fork
- 4
- Chỉ số merge pull request
- Không có pull request nào được merge trong 30 ngày
Mô tả
Trying to run this code for NAACL 2021, got some questions:
- What is the `Track` field, is it different from `Subject Area`? Is `Secondary Subject Area` ever used?
https://github.com/acl-org/reviewer-paper-matching/blob/674734a566ed7dfaa738b9ee7f20048fe2ff9730/softconf_extract.py#L90
- Can assignment papers to ACs be handled by `suggest_reviewers.py` with a filtered `reviewers.jsonl` file? `suggest_ac_reviewers_by_track.py` seems to have a hard-coded link to `Moving-to-COI-Track.csv`:
https://github.com/acl-org/reviewer-paper-matching/blob/674734a566ed7dfaa738b9ee7f20048fe2ff9730/suggest_ac_reviewers_by_track.py#L276
Could this be added to `README`?
- What is the file structure of `Moving-to-COI-Track.csv` and what is the "Move to" column?
https://github.com/acl-org/reviewer-paper-matching/blob/674734a566ed7dfaa738b9ee7f20048fe2ff9730/suggest_ac_reviewers_by_track.py#L281
- Where is the COI detection done? The COI detection repository mentioned in this issue:
https://github.com/acl-org/reviewer-paper-matching/issues/13
is not available:
https://github.com/acl-org/reviewer-coi-detection
In the current repository, COI detection seems to be only dealt in `suggest_ac_reviewers_by_track.py`.
Could this be clarified in `README`?
- Why `calc_reviewer_db_mapping` does not have `author_col` argument anymore? Is it safe to remove it from the function calls in `suggest_reviewers.py`?
https://github.com/acl-org/reviewer-paper-matching/blob/674734a566ed7dfaa738b9ee7f20048fe2ff9730/suggest_reviewers.py#L192
Also notice that the documentation for this field still exists:
https://github.com/acl-org/reviewer-paper-matching/blob/674734a566ed7dfaa738b9ee7f20048fe2ff9730/suggest_utils.py#L20
- `requirements.txt` seems to be missing a few things.
Hướng dẫn đóng góp
Chưa lập chỉ mục được hướng dẫn đóng góp cho kho mã nguồn này
Hướng nghiên cứu
Read README and the referenced entry points in softconf_extract.py, suggest_reviewers.py, suggest_ac_reviewers_by_track.py, and suggest_utils.py. Trace the Track, Moving-to-COI-Track.csv, COI detection, calc_reviewer_db_mapping, and requirements.txt questions against the current code. Done means the README and dependency documentation answer these questions accurately.
Do mô hình lập chỉ mục viết ra từ nội dung của issue.
Đánh giá
- Công nghệ
- python
- Lĩnh vực
- documentation
- Loại issue
- Tài liệu
- Độ khó
- 4/5
- Thời gian dự kiến
- 3-5 ngày
- Mức độ hoạt động
- Đình trệ
- Độ rõ ràng
- Cần làm rõ
- Mức phù hợp với người mới
- 35/100