abetlen / abetlen/llama-cpp-python

LlamaPromptLookupDecoding gives no performance improvement

未關閉
#2,110 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視
主要語言
Python
星號
10.6k
分支
1.4k
PR 合併指標
PR 指標待擷取

描述

I'm automating spelling correction. Currently I'm testing this on a Mistral 7B Instruction Q4_K_M model running in llama.cpp using python bindings, and it works fine. I submit text fragments up to ~2000 characters.

I bumped into the "draft_model" option that does "prompt lookup decoding" (a.k.a. token prediction). Because my output is very similar to my prompt text, I'd assume that activating this would bring me significant performance gain.

But I've been testing this out and I see no performance gain at all, comparing the inference with and without the 'draft_model' option activated. I've tried different values for 'num_pred_tokens', but that doesn't make any difference either.

Using llama.ccp 0.3.16. I'm running on CPU. My prompts consists of an instruction in English and then the text to be corrected in Dutch.

Maybe I'm doing something wrong? Or maybe I don't understand the purpose of this option?

Initialization:

```
n_ctx = 4096

llm = Llama(
model_path=model_path,
n_ctx=n_ctx,
n_threads=8,
temperature=0,
chat_format=None,
draft_model=LlamaPromptLookupDecoding(num_pred_tokens=3),
logits_all=True,
)
```

Inference:

```
output = llm(
prompt=prompt_text,
max_tokens=2048,
temperature=0,
echo=True
)
```

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

評估

這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。