abetlen / abetlen/llama-cpp-python

LlamaPromptLookupDecoding gives no performance improvement

未关闭
#2,110 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
主要语言
Python
星标
10.6k
派生
1.4k
PR 合并指标
PR 指标待抓取

描述

I'm automating spelling correction. Currently I'm testing this on a Mistral 7B Instruction Q4_K_M model running in llama.cpp using python bindings, and it works fine. I submit text fragments up to ~2000 characters.

I bumped into the "draft_model" option that does "prompt lookup decoding" (a.k.a. token prediction). Because my output is very similar to my prompt text, I'd assume that activating this would bring me significant performance gain.

But I've been testing this out and I see no performance gain at all, comparing the inference with and without the 'draft_model' option activated. I've tried different values for 'num_pred_tokens', but that doesn't make any difference either.

Using llama.ccp 0.3.16. I'm running on CPU. My prompts consists of an instruction in English and then the text to be corrected in Dutch.

Maybe I'm doing something wrong? Or maybe I don't understand the purpose of this option?

Initialization:

```
n_ctx = 4096

llm = Llama(
model_path=model_path,
n_ctx=n_ctx,
n_threads=8,
temperature=0,
chat_format=None,
draft_model=LlamaPromptLookupDecoding(num_pred_tokens=3),
logits_all=True,
)
```

Inference:

```
output = llm(
prompt=prompt_text,
max_tokens=2048,
temperature=0,
echo=True
)
```

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。