a-b-street / a-b-street/speedwalk

QA: Cleanup (missing) crossing ways(?)

未关闭
#16 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
主要语言
Svelte
星标
24
派生
5
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

## Case

When sidewalks are mapped separately, it is not uncommon that the are missing separate way segments for the crossing. In those cases, the part of the crossing across the street is also just a sidewalk (or path, …)

## Question

We talked about this as a QA step, but I wonder if it is actually needed…
For the analysis that we are planning, we will look at the intersection points, rather than the crossing-ways.

It is a good QA step to create clean OSM Data, of course. But it is not crucial to generate and analyse a foot network, IMO. Right?

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。