Add Initializer as a term to 2.1

Open
#147 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
1/5
Estimated time
Under an hour
Newbie friendliness
55/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
python
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Open section 2.1 and review the terminology entry containing “constructor,” including the treatment of synonymous terms such as “instance variable” and “attributes.” Add “initializer” alongside “constructor,” then confirm the section presents both terms as synonyms.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Constructor's are referred to as initializers in Python. 2.1 only has constructor as a term.

Describe the solution you'd like
Initializer should be added as a term alongside constructor in this section. This should be done in the same way that both "instance variable" and "attributes" are treated as synonymous terms in this section.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
28
Forks
42
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from RunestoneInteractive/java4python

All issues in RunestoneInteractive/java4python

Similar issues

More Python issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.