Do I need to hardcode my own GPG keys for new UserGPGKey class?

Background

I'm developing a UserGPGKey class to expose this library to GitHub's REST API endpoints for GPG keys. The UserGPG class is moduled similar to the already-existing UserKey class. The necessiary modifcations have been made to NamedUser and AuthenticatedUser in order to access GPG keys after authentication.

Problem

In the tests of UserKey, AuthenticatedUser, and NamedUser tests, there is information provived on some SSH keys which from my understanding comes from @jacquev6. Here are screenshots from the codebase showcasing what I am refering to:

tests/UserKey.py

tests/AuthenticatedUser.py

tests/NamedUser.py

What I'd like to know is if I'd need something similar and hardcode information from my own GPG key(s) into the testing code for UserGPGKey?

If possible, I'd like to avoid doing this for privacy reasons.
Thanks in advance for reading this rather lengthy issue! 😅

首先查看 tests/UserKey.py、tests/AuthenticatedUser.py 和 tests/NamedUser.py，以了解现有的密钥 fixture 和访问模式。然后将这些模式与提议的 UserGPGKey 类及其对 NamedUser 和 AuthenticatedUser 的更改进行比较；done 应包括适当的测试，且不需要 contributor 的私有 GPG 密钥数据。