OpenFreeEnergy / OpenFreeEnergy/ExampleNotebooks
do we still want a colab link on PRs now what we have ReviewNB?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 70
- Forks
- 15
- Avg merge
- 10h 42m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
For example: https://github.com/OpenFreeEnergy/ExampleNotebooks/pull/278#issuecomment-3639561791
Maybe we just make a colab button manual? We're kind of de-emphasizing using colab for the time being.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the example in pull request #278 and its linked comment, then compare the current role of Colab links with ReviewNB. Decide whether PRs should keep the link, make the Colab button manual, or remove it; the work is done when the project’s preferred notebook-review workflow is unambiguous.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- jupyter-notebook
- Domain
- developer-experience
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100