Meshing for non-contiguous phases

Open
#15 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
matlab

Research direction

Start by reproducing meshing on a domain containing non-contiguous phases and inspect the post-processing that assigns region label 0. Trace how connectivity is handled and determine the expected labels for isolated clusters; the issue is done when those cells are assigned correctly without breaking contiguous-phase meshing.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

bug enhancement

Currently, if the domain to be meshed has non-contiguous phases (i.e., isolated clusters), the meshed region are assigned to the label 0. The post-processing used to re-assign such cells is perfectible. I was not aware this issue was related to connectivity, now that i know what produce the region label 0, I can make a better post-processing.

Dominant language
MATLAB
Stars
76
Forks
27
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from NatLabRockies/MATBOX_Microstructure_analysis_toolbox

All issues in NatLabRockies/MATBOX_Microstructure_analysis_toolbox

Similar issues

More MATLAB issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.