MrGiovanni / MrGiovanni/ModelsGenesis

Question about skip-connection in Reconstruction Task

Open
#43 2 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Jupyter Notebook
Stars
791
Forks
141
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

I think the role of skip-connection is rather disturbing in your paper where reconstruction tasks are usually performed, what do you think?

Using skip connection in reconstruction often transfers a lot of information intact in the initial layer. However, you put a strong distortion on input, probably which is why the cheating problem does not occur.

what do you think about it? Does skip-connection play an important role in your reconstruction task?

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are named. This is an unanswered research question about skip connections in the reconstruction task; start by reviewing the referenced paper and model implementation, and consider it done only when the connection's role is documented or the question is resolved.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
machine-learning
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
10/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.