MagicStack / MagicStack/uvloop

Tests trying to find unused ports are flakey when automated

未关闭
#513 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

主要语言
Cython
星标
11.9k
派生
615
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

  • uvloop version: 0.17.0
  • Python version: 3.10
  • Platform: nix/darwin
  • Can you reproduce the bug with PYTHONASYNCIODEBUG in env?: N/A
  • Does uvloop behave differently from vanilla asyncio? How?: N/A

The tests using find_free_port (like https://github.com/MagicStack/uvloop/blob/d2deffefa18653636eb03ea77a5dab6e4febf6c6/tests/test_tcp.py#L252) may fail in busy CI environments. For example building for nixpkgs involves running tests every time. It ends up with: (https://hydra.nixos.org/build/197525892/nixlog/1)

=================================== FAILURES ===================================
_______________________ Test_UV_TCP.test_create_server_5 _______________________
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/private/tmp/tmp.xkcj6kx4o4/tests/test_tcp.py", line 245, in test_create_server_5
    self.loop.run_until_complete(runner())
  File "uvloop/loop.pyx", line 1517, in uvloop.loop.Loop.run_until_complete
  File "/private/tmp/tmp.xkcj6kx4o4/tests/test_tcp.py", line 238, in runner
    srv = await self.loop.create_server(
  File "uvloop/loop.pyx", line 1790, in create_server
OSError: [Errno 48] error while attempting to bind on address ('::', 50000, 0, 0): address already in use
_______________________ Test_UV_TCP.test_create_server_6 _______________________
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/private/tmp/tmp.xkcj6kx4o4/tests/test_tcp.py", line 271, in test_create_server_6
    self.loop.run_until_complete(runner())
  File "uvloop/loop.pyx", line 1517, in uvloop.loop.Loop.run_until_complete
  File "/private/tmp/tmp.xkcj6kx4o4/tests/test_tcp.py", line 255, in runner
    srv1 = await self.loop.create_server(
  File "uvloop/loop.pyx", line 1790, in create_server
OSError: [Errno 48] error while attempting to bind on address ('::', 50000, 0, 0): address already in use
=============================== warnings summary ===============================

Do those tests need to use a common ipv4/6 socket? Could they use only one protocol at a time with port 0 and then get the local port number from the result?

Or maybe build the retry loop around the first socket creation rather than 2 independent steps?

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

从 tests/test_tcp.py 开始,尤其关注 test_create_server_5 和 test_create_server_6 附近使用 find_free_port 的测试。在自动化或繁忙的环境中重现这些失败,然后评估使用端口 0、共享的 IPv4/IPv6 套接字,或重试创建第一个套接字。完成的标准是:测试不再因为所选端口已被占用而失败。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
python
领域
networking, testing
Issue 类型
缺陷
难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
活跃度
停滞
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
35/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。