Making pool connection cycling async

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

* **asyncpg version**: 0.14
* **PostgreSQL version**: 9.5/9.6
* **Do you use a PostgreSQL SaaS? If so, which? Can you reproduce
the issue with a local PostgreSQL install?**: AWS RDS
* **Python version**: 3.6
* **Platform**: linux in docker
* **Do you use pgbouncer?**: Not in this instances
* **Did you install asyncpg with pip?**: yes
* **If you built asyncpg locally, which version of Cython did you use?**:
* **Can the issue be reproduced under both asyncio and
[uvloop](https://github.com/magicstack/uvloop)?**: We only use asyncio

We have some application containers that use asyncpg connection pools, every now and again my performance tracing on our application request handlers shows that the `connect` method in the `Pool` takes a significant amount of time (sometimes 150ms) when establishing a connection to our RDS postgres instance (same Region).

The Pool has options to control how often a connection is pro-actively cycled, but my concern is that this results in clients of the pool having to wait for a connection to be established - I would much rather push this into a background async task who's job it is to take connections in/out of service so that inbound http requests to our server never incur the latency of performing the connection themselves.

Is this already doable or would it require some changes to asyncpg?

Comece lendo o ponto de entrada Pool.connect e as opções existentes do pool para fazer a rotação proativa das conexões. Rastreie quando o estabelecimento da conexão ocorre para requisições de entrada e determine quais mudanças seriam necessárias para fazer a rotação em segundo plano; considera-se concluído quando os clientes do pool não incorrem mais nessa latência de estabelecimento da conexão.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.