LuaLS / LuaLS/lua-language-server
noisy `-32801` ("Content Modified") errors
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Lua
- Sterne
- 4.4k
- Forks
- 442
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
How are you using the lua-language-server?
NeoVim
Which OS are you using?
MacOS
What is the issue affecting?
Other
Expected Behaviour
In the request-completion path, when the server has computed a result against document version V, return that result regardless of whether didChange for V+1 (or later) has since arrived. Only return -32801 if the document
modification was genuinely external / out-of-band — which is rare in normal usage and not what didChange represents.
If pre-empting in-flight requests on didChange is desired as an optimization, the spec-compliant signal is for the client to send $/cancelRequest. The server should not unilaterally short-circuit valid in-flight work with -32801.
Per the spec, the client is supposed to handle staleness via cancellation. With lua-language-server pre-empting that decision and erroring instead:
- Clients that handle
-32801strictly as an error end up logging spurious errors (cf. neovim/neovim#40208). - Clients that could have used the older-version result (perfectly valid per the spec — "even computed on an older state might still be useful") never get the chance.
- Clients that wanted to cancel can no longer rely on
$/cancelRequestsemantics because the server has already aborted on its own initiative.
Actual Behaviour
Sending a fast sequence of didChanges while semantic-tokens requests are in flight causes the server to error every in-flight request with:
{ "code": -32801, "message": "Content modified." }
even though the modification was delivered through normal didChange notifications, not "outside normal conditions."
Reproduction steps
- Open a Lua file in any LSP-capable editor that requests
semanticTokens/full(e.g. Neovim 0.12+). - Start typing across multiple lines, fast enough that successive
didChangenotifications outpace the server's processing. - Observe: every in-flight semantic-tokens request comes back with
-32801 Content modified.instead of a (possibly stale) result.
Additional Notes
lua-language-server returns LSP error -32801 ("Content Modified") in response to textDocument/semanticTokens/full (and likely other requests) whenever a textDocument/didChange notification arrives before the response is sent.
This contradicts the LSP specification, which explicitly forbids using -32801 for content changes detected in unprocessed messages — i.e. for the exact case currently being signaled.
What the spec says:
LSP §responseError.code (specifically the ContentModified = -32801 entry):
The server detected that the content of a document got modified outside normal conditions. A server should NOT send this error code if it detects a content change in its unprocessed messages. The result even computed on an older
state might still be useful for the client.If a client decides that a result is not of any use anymore the client should cancel the request.
So the intended semantics are:
-32801is for "out-of-band" content modification (e.g., the file on disk changed in a way the server can't reconcile with its in-flight state).
Log File
No response
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne damit, den textDocument/semanticTokens/full-Anfragepfad nachzuverfolgen und zu untersuchen, wie textDocument/didChange-Benachrichtigungen laufende Anfragen beeinflussen. Vergleiche dieses Verhalten mit der Spezifikation für LSP responseError.code; abgeschlossen ist die Arbeit, wenn normale in die Warteschlange eingereihte Dokumentänderungen nicht mehr -32801 erzeugen, während tatsächlich externe Änderungen dies weiterhin können.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- lua, neovim
- Bereich
- devtools
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 48/100