LuaLS / LuaLS/lua-language-server

Generics don't expand alias types/don't work with other parameters

未關閉
#2,355 3 則留言 3 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

主要語言
Lua
星號
4.4k
分支
442
PR 合併指標
30 天內沒有已合併 PR

描述

How are you using the lua-language-server?

Visual Studio Code Extension (sumneko.lua)

Which OS are you using?

Windows

What is the issue affecting?

Type Checking

Expected Behaviour

With a code sample like this:

---@alias TestFunction fun(abc: string): integer

---@generic T
---@param name `T`
---@param func T
local function testSecond(name, func) end

testSecond("TestFunction", function(abc) end)

I would expect abc to have a type of string, and the function to be type checked and require a return.

Actual Behaviour

Instead, abc has the any type and the function requires no return.
I further tested with a different code sample:

---@alias TestFunction fun(abc: string): integer

---@generic T
---@param name `T`
---@return T
local function testSecond(name, func) return function(abc) end end

local cool = testSecond("TestFunction", function(abc) end)
cool()

This shows no warnings and does not require me to pass any arguments to cool(), which is incorrect. Hovering over cool provides a type of 'TestFunction' and does not show the full expanded type of the alias, unlike other variables with a type of an alias. That rings the same with this code sample I also tested:

---@alias TestFunction fun(abc: string): integer

---@generic T
---@param name `T`
---@param func fun(cool: T)
local function testSecond(name, func) end

testSecond("TestFunction", function(abc) end)

where hovering over abc provides me with a 'TestFunction' unexpanded type.
However, correct behavior is seen with the following code sample using the base string type;

---@alias TestFunction fun(abc: string): integer

---@generic T
---@param name `T`
---@param func fun(cool: T)
---@return T
local function testSecond(name, func) end

local cool = testSecond("string", function(abc) abc.cool = "hi" end)
local testfind = cool:find("test")

Autocomplete is provided for :find() and abc.cool = "hi" throws the correct warning for field injection.
And most confusing of all, this code sample behaves in line with expected behavior, and the alias is fully expanded.

---@alias TestFunction fun(abc: string): integer

---@generic T
---@param name `T`
---@param func fun(cool: T)
---@return T
local function testSecond(name, func) end

local cool = testSecond("TestFunction",
    ---@param abc TestFunction
    function(abc)
        abc()
    end
)

This also doesn't work, which I kind of expected. (no warnings)
image

Reproduction steps
  1. Paste code into project with Lua LSP on, see issue
Additional Notes

No response

Log File

No response

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

研究方向

首先,在使用 LuaLS 的 Visual Studio Code Extension 中重現這些範例,重點關注泛型參數和 aliased function types 的型別檢查。比較使用 TestFunction 的情況與使用基礎 string 型別的情況。完成的標準是:別名能夠一致地展開,回呼參數能夠取得預期型別,並且無效呼叫或缺少回傳值時會產生警告。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

評估

技術堆疊
lua
領域
devtools
Issue 類型
缺陷
難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
活躍度
停滯
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
38/100

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。