LuaLS / LuaLS/lua-language-server
Template Annotation
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Lua
- 星标
- 4.4k
- 派生
- 442
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
描述
I love the new missing-fields diagnostic! It is super helpful to guarantee safety especially for function arguments (though its usefullness in my repo has stagnated slightly due to https://github.com/LuaLS/lua-language-server/issues/2214)
However, it does come into conflict with something I do in a few places where I specifically set a type annotation for the autocomplete where the data in the table is initialized later in a meta_table (or the data is only every accessible through the meta_table).
---@type WeaponsUnitData
Weapons.unit = {}
setmetatable(Weapons.unit, Metatable.unit_metatable())
With the new missing-fields diagnostic I get a warning here, that Weapons.unit doesn't contain all of the fields on WeaponsUnitData. I was wondering with the missing-fields diagnostic we could get a ---@template annotation which could describe the shape of a table without having to define all of the fields on it. (As a cleaner alternative to having to do ---@diagnostic disable-next-line: missing-fields in a bunch of places). I am sure other people were also using tables in other weird ways before as well, this would allow an easy transition for them.
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从现有的 missing-fields 诊断以及 ---@type 涉及的注解处理入手。确定 ---@template 注解如何在不要求包含每个字段的情况下描述表的结构,然后验证使用 Weapons.unit 的示例不再产生警告,同时正常的缺失字段检查仍保持不变。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- lua
- 领域
- devtools
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 30/100