Feedback on the part on results

I recompiled the report myself, and I wonder if I did something wrong, because the results section is inconsistent and contains many typos. Is it a draft? Did you forget to push commits?

In its present state, it requires major changes. Some of them are:

- Section numbers are wrong (double numbers);
- The legend of the "Small Datasets: Efficiency vs. Accuracy Trade-off" figure is incomplete: what do shapes stand for?
- This legend is inconsistent with the text.
- The figure "Impact of CR on Large Datasets" makes no sense at all.
- A figure appears to be missing in the clean versus noisy analysis.
- The discussion feels like chatGPT and is not in line with the results (it mentions a heatmap that is not there any more).

Start by recompiling the report and reviewing the results section against the source material. Check the section numbering, the legend and text for “Small Datasets: Efficiency vs. Accuracy Trade-off,” the “Impact of CR on Large Datasets” figure, and the clean-versus-noisy analysis for the reported inconsistencies and missing figure. Done means the figures, legends, discussion, and numbering are mutually consistent.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.