GoogleCloudPlatform / GoogleCloudPlatform/cloud-sql-proxy-operator
AuthProxyWorkload status grows without pruning for Pod selectors
- Ngôn ngữ chính
- Go
- Star
- 120
- Fork
- 18
- Chỉ số merge pull request
- Không có pull request nào được merge trong 30 ngày
Mô tả
## Summary
`AuthProxyWorkload` status appears to grow without bound when `spec.workloadSelector.kind: Pod` matches short-lived pods with unique names. The controller replaces an existing status entry only when `(name, namespace, kind, version)` matches; otherwise it appends a new entry. I could not find pruning of status entries for pods that no longer exist.
For high-churn workloads such as workflow/batch pods, deleted pod names therefore remain in `status.WorkloadStatus` permanently. Over time the APW object can become large enough that status updates fail with Kubernetes/etcd request-size errors, leaving reconcile status stale and preventing spec changes from being reflected in status.
## Observed impact
A Pod-selector APW matching ephemeral workflow pods accumulated thousands of stale pod entries and grew to roughly megabyte-scale status. Reconcile attempts then failed with errors of the form:
```text
etcdserver: request is too large
trying to send message larger than max (... vs. 2097152)
```
Clearing `status.WorkloadStatus` allowed reconcile to succeed again, but deleting completed pods alone did not remove the stale status entries, so the object would grow again with future pod churn.
## Expected behavior
The controller should bound APW status growth for `kind: Pod` selectors, for example by pruning status entries that no longer correspond to currently matching live workloads, compacting status for Pod selectors, or documenting/guarding against using Pod selectors for high-churn pods.
## Notes
This is most visible for `kind: Pod` selectors because pod names are often unique and short lived. The same status model is less likely to grow unbounded for stable controller objects such as Deployments or StatefulSets.
I checked releases through v1.7.10 and did not find a change that appears to address this behavior.
Hướng dẫn đóng góp
Đánh giá
Issue này chưa được đánh giá.