FasterXML / FasterXML/java-classmate

Correct approach to compare `ResolvedType` with a raw `Class<?>`?

未關閉
#72 3 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視
主要語言
Java
星號
266
分支
47
平均合併
1 小時 42 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
1

描述

What's the appropriate way to see if a `ResolvedType` represents a simple class that I know about?

Let's say I pass a `new GenericType{}` to a method, and I just want to see if the generic parameter is `String`. I think (I haven't tried it yet) I would do this (code not optimized, for illustration):

```java
void foo(GenericType genericType) {
TypeResolver typeResolver = new TypeResolver();
ResolvedType resolvedType = typeResolver.resolve(genericType);
```

How would I then see if `resolvedType` indicates a simple `String`? I'm guessing I could do this:

```java
if(resolvedType.getTypeParameters.isEmpty() && resolvedType.getErasedType().equals(String.class)) {

```

But that seems sort of awkward. Is there a better way?

(Note that the `resolvedType.getTypeParameters.isEmpty()` check is arguably not necessary here, as `String` has no generic parameters, but I'm looking for a general approach.)

Or should I be going in the other direction, resolving `String.class` and then comparing the resolved types?

```java
if(resolvedType.equals(typeResolver.resolve(String.class))) {

```

I don't know how much overhead the extra resolution of `String.class` adds, though.

This may be related to #31.

貢獻指南

這個儲存庫沒有索引到貢獻指南

評估

這個 Issue 還沒有評估資料。

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。